RhettButler posted:It was still better than Superman Returns. I would rank all Batman films, in the following order:
Batman Returns-Very underrated
The Dark Knight
Batman Begins
Batman (1989)
Batman Forever
Batman and Robin
While Tim Burton's Batman movies were huge for our generation, I can't say I feel any particular desire to go back and watch them. The atmosphere and the set designs, with all their Gothic/Art Deco awesomeness, just couldn't cover up the campy-ass attitude with which Burton approached those movies.
I'm not huge into comic books by any stretch of the imagination, but I've always dug Batman's style. I have to paraphrase Stephen King on this one, but what really makes Batman so much better than, say, Superman or the X-Men, is that he doesn't have super powers. He's just a guy who succeeds by the virtue of his intelligence and determination alone. Nolan brought this idea to film, and did a damn good job. Batman Begins and Dark Knight deal with real metaphysical issues, and do so intelligently and without being preachy about it. Burton's films had... well... Jack Nicholson and Danny DeVito.
Joel Schumacher's films were just intolerable, in my opinion. All shine and no substance, which is somewhat disappointing given Schumacher's other works.
Anyway, on the issue of the third Nolan films' chief adversary, I'm not sure where they could go from here. I honestly thought they blew their wad on R'as al Ghul, who is, in my opinion, the most complex and compelling of the Batman baddies. Then, they went and surprised the shit out of me with their take on the traditionally-campy Joker. I'm at a loss right now. I don't know who they'll pick (maybe R'as will return, as he's known to do), but I'm pretty sure they'll do it well.