hippygeek posted:Cross post from ETS regarding the title...
See, here's where my thinking's going. As others have pointed out, every half assed (and experienced) editor is going to be dropping their DVDs on the pirate bay etc, and I can bet you that a pile of these will be called "Lights in The Sky" and "Lights In The Sky Over North America".
So, in terms of branding what the content is, that's fine (if a little bland) , but in terms of branding
this project it sucks monkey balls.
eg, 6 months from now, when someone mentions the "Lights in the Sky" DVD, will they be referring to ours? Whereas, if we give it a unique name, it can easier be branded as a separate entity. I see this release as being part of the "lights in the sky" family rather than
the release.
Question is, should I edit what goes into the top twenty to take into account people's laziness and to bitchslap their lack of imagination and creativity? ;-)
That's not to say that the cover doesn't have LITS on it, just that it won't be the actual title. I visualize the final title as something like:
TITLE
Lights In The Sky 2008
this one is on us
Make sense?
I agree with Hippygeek. Let's make this a fan-made project rather than a way to massively merchandise a DVD or DVD set. I think that'd be very cool for the fans and the band.
Look at the best thing that could come of it: Instead of several people buying a DVD that's the same: Same direction, same cinematography, same set-list, features, etc. now fans or novices alike can have a choice of a different interpretation of each show or the tour.
I mean, "Closure: Pt. 1" is cool, but imagine how much cooler it could be if you could buy different shows with different camera angles from different fans. It keeps something from getting old. This is especially good if you have more fans do various kinds of arrangements of set-lists from different shows in different combinations. (Look at how the Marilyn Manson "Guns, God, And Government" DVD had spliced together various audio/video of the set-list from different shows for each song. This way for a NIN concert or tour, that technique could be approached infinite different ways for each consumers choosing.)
I also like Hippygeek's idea to simply give the footage away as an act of charity to the fans rather than make a buck off of it. This could get more users inspired to use different methods of "visually re-mixing" the footage.
Sure, the problem is that some of the edits of the concert footage will be sloppy and rushed. But look at how many devoted fans will do crisp, clean edits that could come from Scorcese.
I wonder if a lot of these could be used for a thesis/project for film school for an Editing course. Being that one of my former life-choices was to go to NYU film school when I was a teenager, I'd say that would be a cool idea.
And, like it or not, NIN is helping support people's education and career advancement that way. Yay!