LEONCIORULES posted:
It's not really a remake but a different adaptation of the original novel. The previous movie changed many things from the novel and this new adaptation is going to keep many things that the previous one didn't, and at the same time will change a few others.
Same story with "Let The Right One In." There's no point in remaking the film or "attempting to re-interpret the source material" so soon after the last movie came out aside from making money off of something that has proven to make money.
Then again, I MIGHT be wrong, and it could be a very different and artistic remake, but I doubt it. I like a lot Fincher and all, but his decision to remake the movie definitely made him lose a lot of cool points for me. The Swedish Films were excellent, they don't need to be redone.
I was talking to a guy raving about "Let Me In" and I told him he should have seen the original first. Then he told me he didn't care about crappy Swedish movies, because he's not Swedish and can't be bothered to read subtitles. I think this is the attitude with a lot of American Remakes, aside from adding American faces and American names, and spending 3 times as much more money to make and in turn make 10 times the profit. In some cases, Hollywood actively tries to suppress knowledge of the original. (I took a film class on the Fantastic Film genre, and we had a some readings that gave examples on how they would do this...but I can't find the pdfs at the moment)
This issue hits me harder because I'm trying to be a film maker, and would hate to see someone take my work, dump money and famous people in it, then take the credit and make more money off of it while I'm still unknown and unrecognized.