How To Destroy Angels
 
Page: <  First... 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55...Last >

05/08/10 6:57 PM

Zaeed_Massani posted:
GreyFox33 posted:
I feel this is probably the only soft/slow song on the ep that will wrap up the album. I look forward to M letting her voice open up and take control!

I wont fully judge till we get a listen to the full EP. We all should have faith cause Trent wouldnt be apart of something that was trash!

"A Drowning is fairly unlike the rest of the EP. The rest of it gets noisier.", that's what Trent Reznor wrote about it.

So I guess you might be right.

I hope you're right, though I like A Drowning, but without being very impressed.

 

05/08/10 7:03 PM

I am so tired of this ....:points to above threads and beyond:.

It's really getting old guys.

 

05/08/10 9:31 PM

http://www.kaitaia.com/funny/pictures/ThreadHijack/thread_direction.gif

 

05/08/10 10:02 PM

khareaulyn posted:
Zaeed_Massani posted:
GreyFox33 posted:
I feel this is probably the only soft/slow song on the ep that will wrap up the album. I look forward to M letting her voice open up and take control!

I wont fully judge till we get a listen to the full EP. We all should have faith cause Trent wouldnt be apart of something that was trash!

"A Drowning is fairly unlike the rest of the EP. The rest of it gets noisier.", that's what Trent Reznor wrote about it.

So I guess you might be right.

I hope you're right, though I like A Drowning, but without being very impressed.

At first listen I also wasn't too fond of it; the overly somber tone kind of fell flat. It's not a bad song and sort of reminds me of some stuff from The Fragile, but I'm looking forward to hearing some of the other songs.

 

05/09/10 1:45 AM

Can I just ask why the email addresses collected when signing up for HTDA aren't utilised. It's just that I know several people who, for whatever reason, don't do twitter / forums and it would be quite useful for them to be emailed when a clip comes out (they still hear from me but I'm sure there are others like this)

 

05/09/10 4:23 AM

WorzelG posted:
Can I just ask why the email addresses collected when signing up for HTDA aren't utilised. It's just that I know several people who, for whatever reason, don't do twitter / forums and it would be quite useful for them to be emailed when a clip comes out (they still hear from me but I'm sure there are others like this)
i'm glad they don't spam subscribers. who wants to stay updated without using twitter etc. can subscribe to HTDA's twitter RSS and get the news in his feedreader.

 

05/09/10 4:27 AM

lucreziag posted:
oneduality posted:
My responses get deleted out of the blue for no reason at all .. it's getting annoying..

My last post was in defense of Mariqueen and it's vanished ...are the forums just so glitchy that things vanish? or do the mods actually delete things without warning? of the latter is true, that's extremely stupid.. if something gets deleted because it violated something then speak up and tell me.

If the forums just ate it becaue of a technical issue, that's something else..

I was wondering about that too, because something I wrote also "vanished." I don't know if it's censorship or technical problems smiling smiley

I have had a look back over the the last few pages and cant seem to find any post by you guys that have been 'hidden' - they are not 'deleted' they are only visible to Moderators, so that they can be unhidden on appeal by pm or used if someone has seriously broken the rules.

If members have had posts hidden it is because they contain things that either have nothing to do with the thread, contain photoshops, are just members bashing each other that when repeatedly quoted by other members spiral out of control, or of course they cross the line on what not to talk about regarding TR & Q. It is easy and better for maintaining thread direction for us to moderate in this way because no matter how hard we try it seems that some members are unable to grasp what is unhelpful to maintaining a constructive discussion. This is unfortunate, because, as I have said before, EVERYONE has a hand in moderating the board by thinking about what they are posting before they post. Is it constructive? Is it just going to result in bashing each other? Is it trolling for a reaction?

The fact that Members now know that we can and do hide posts may help to encourage members to think about what they post in this way.

What I will also say is that despite the above, there are members here who do contribute great things and are very good at helping to maintain the standards of discussion.

If anyone has any questions about the above please do not discuss it here, take it to the moderation thread.

Thanks.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/09/2010 05:50AM by YKWYA.

 

05/09/10 5:43 AM

Anomalie posted:
I have been lurking for days, and listening to the single over and over, hoping that it would get better....

#1 Regarding Q's vocals I am reminded of something Dorothy Parker once said "She runs the gamut of emotions from A to B."



#2 The music itself seems like it could have been taken from left-over studio work from anytime in the last 4 years.

1+2= Fail.

If you are going to embark on a new project, push the boundries, go places you have never been before. I know that in the Q&A TR said that it sounds more NINish now then he thinks it will in the future. Perhaps then they should have let this gestate a little longer.

If they are going to make Q the "leader" of the project, which from the promo pics one would assume they are, shouldnt she also be the voice? Why is TR answering the question? Why not put her out there? I would like to hear what she has to say.

As far as the people who are having a hard time relating to Q as an artist, I understand where you are coming from. Some of the things that she has said, make me seriously question wiether she has the depth for real artistic integrity. Yes, I do think that people are intitled to have off moments, but by and far I have yet to find anything that proves that there is something there besides a nice body and a pretty face.

I was thinking along similar lines, but just wasn't sure how to express it. Thank you for saying what I was thinking! smiling smiley

 

05/09/10 6:40 AM

Moral posted:
because howtodestroyangels.com doesn't have a discussion forum yet, and nin discussion might as well be "trent" discussion... as that is how its been treated for years.

jayetheartist posted:
If it needs to be moved, the mods will move it. Let them worry about it.

I don't really agree with either of you, but ok. I understand there are mods that take care of matters like this, but still... I hear a bunch of fans telling everyone not to look at htda as we looked at nin, and yet here it is in the same section. If it is a different matter I do think it shouldn't be in here.
But sure, do what ever you want. I just really think that's kinda contradicting yourselves.


Now on topic, I hear a lot of people saying that we should "detach" the music from the artist, and I'd like to say that to some degree, I understand why, and agree, but I don't think that in this case it will be an easy thing to do. And I'm saying this because we are dealing with a bunch of NIN fans, that have followed Trent for years and want the best for him, and now there's a lady in the picture - and I do believe this relationship is the most "public" one -, and people get intrigued. I think it is obvious that people start digging into her live and start to relate the person to the music. At least that happened to me to some degree. I gave up on doing so because I saw how it affected how I "looked" at the music, and also because it was kinda stalk-ish of me.
SO, my point is, to be detached, we probably would have to never look up Mariqueens life, and I believe that I wasn't the only one making that mistake in the past, and now we can't really "unsee" or "unlearn" what we did about her. So yes, detaching is near impossible, though I understand it's importance.

 

05/09/10 7:30 AM

inesperfectdrug posted:
SO, my point is, to be detached, we probably would have to never look up Mariqueens life, and I believe that I wasn't the only one making that mistake in the past, and now we can't really "unsee" or "unlearn" what we did about her. So yes, detaching is near impossible, though I understand it's importance.

I think maybe "detaching" is probably the wrong word. I think the best thing to do is to not judge based on a past life. Isn't that what everyone would want for themselves?

The way I see it, Q and TR started a new life when they married...so why can't we just start from there and look forward? It really isn't fair to judge anyone on what they did in the past, I know many of us don't of Trent (ie. drugs), why not apply the same to Mariqueen? I believe those that do are just being judgmental because they are not willing to keep an open mind or some psychological problem (ie. obsessiveness and whatnot).

Now, can we all just talk about HTDA, the music....and not HTDA, let's pick people apart?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/09/2010 07:31AM by OMS.

 

05/09/10 8:11 AM

OMS posted:
inesperfectdrug posted:
SO, my point is, to be detached, we probably would have to never look up Mariqueens life, and I believe that I wasn't the only one making that mistake in the past, and now we can't really "unsee" or "unlearn" what we did about her. So yes, detaching is near impossible, though I understand it's importance.

I think maybe "detaching" is probably the wrong word. I think the best thing to do is to not judge based on a past life. Isn't that what everyone would want for themselves?

The way I see it, Q and TR started a new life when they married...so why can't we just start from there and look forward? It really isn't fair to judge anyone on what they did in the past, I know many of us don't of Trent (ie. drugs), why not apply the same to Mariqueen? I believe those that do are just being judgmental because they are not willing to keep an open mind or some psychological problem (ie. obsessiveness and whatnot).

Now, can we all just talk about HTDA, the music....and not HTDA, let's pick people apart?

You made a good point there (TR - drugs).

I'm waiting for new "noisier" songs to come out so I can make up my opinion!I'm a little scared it might sounds too much like NIN, tbh!

 

05/09/10 8:28 AM

Yes, many of Trent's fans are obsessed. In fact that's what drives the whole NIN movement, our presence here, heck, the music industry in general. And there are hundreds of examples of this right across the musical (and sporting) spectrum which are just as uncanny. But music is not created in a black box, it is emotive and illicits an emotional response, so I see nothing wrong with these kinds of reactions (whatever they say about the protagonist). Yet I'm sure no-one means any harm by them, in fact ironically, they are symptomatic of our affection for Trent and our deep affection for his music.
Though the fact is our impression of Trent also comes from never having met him, yet we have built up a profile of him remotely - through interviews, pictures, what we share with each other, etc. This is an important and legitimate part of becoming (somebody's) fan. Who doesn't know where Trent was born, how old he is, and who his idols are?

So aologies for getting off topic. but while this behaviour may not seem entirely rational to some, it's unavoidable in most cases i fear. Fact is, there is no right or wrong... just forum rules to house what we think and control what we express. smiling smiley

OMS posted:
inesperfectdrug posted:
SO, my point is, to be detached, we probably would have to never look up Mariqueens life, and I believe that I wasn't the only one making that mistake in the past, and now we can't really "unsee" or "unlearn" what we did about her. So yes, detaching is near impossible, though I understand it's importance.

I think maybe "detaching" is probably the wrong word. I think the best thing to do is to not judge based on a past life. Isn't that what everyone would want for themselves?

The way I see it, Q and TR started a new life when they married...so why can't we just start from there and look forward? It really isn't fair to judge anyone on what they did in the past, I know many of us don't of Trent (ie. drugs), why not apply the same to Mariqueen? I believe those that do are just being judgmental because they are not willing to keep an open mind or some psychological problem (ie. obsessiveness and whatnot).

Now, can we all just talk about HTDA, the music....and not HTDA, let's pick people apart?

 

05/09/10 8:47 AM

OMS posted:
The way I see it, Q and TR started a new life when they married...so why can't we just start from there and look forward? It really isn't fair to judge anyone on what they did in the past, I know many of us don't of Trent (ie. drugs), why not apply the same to Mariqueen? I believe those that do are just being judgmental because they are not willing to keep an open mind or some psychological problem (ie. obsessiveness and whatnot).

EXCELLENT POINT.

i think the reason, though, that Trent is treated differently (besides the crazy obsessive personality reason) is that for a lot of us his *problems* aren't in the past. We were right there, living life right along with him and making mistakes as well, so we view these *mistakes* differently. With her, most of us are getting to know her right now, and haven't shared her life experiences with her up to this point.

Any which way, your point is EXCELLENT. We need to wipe the slate clean for both of them now, and just listen without judgment. If we like it, great, if not there is plenty of other music out there to listen to. And besides, this forum is very clear about the rules. Continuing to try to discuss her as a person under ANY guise is pointless, and it only gives the mods indigestion and further points out to Trent (who probably stopped reading this thread halfway through) why his fanbase is *batshit crazy*.

And i also think HTDA needs its own subforum. its clearly a side project and not NIN. but more importantly, those who want to discuss the artwork or touring or individual songs can do so without reading through 50+ pages.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/09/2010 08:49AM by fleighing.

 

05/09/10 9:00 AM

fleighing posted:
EXCELLENT POINT.


And i also think HTDA needs its own subforum. its clearly a side project and not NIN. but more importantly, those who want to discuss the artwork or touring or individual songs can do so without reading through 50+ pages.

Thank you.

I have a feeling that the HTDA website will transform into a place that will be more interactive and maybe include a forum.

I just want to go out on a limb (since this thread has remained viable and has not moved to another area of the nin.com forum) and say that maybe this thread was intentionally kept in this section of the forum for optimal exposure. Personally, I NEVER visit the Music threads (as well as others), but always visit the NIN Discussion threads. Note that the home page never changed to promote HTDA other than showing retweets in the "twitter box".

 

05/09/10 11:14 AM

tweakersdown posted:
samuraijenn posted:
MissKaren posted:
tweakersdown posted:
I like the song itself, the music is great as well as the production. The only thing I could comment on is that I wish she had a little more emotion in her vocals. Other than that, I like it a lot.

I respect your opinion, but I have to say I think Mariqueen's vocals are very well-suited to the song...A Drowning has a melancholy, desperate, quiet vibe and her vocals convey fragility and vulnerability.

I have heard her sing with WIG, and she absolutely can belt it out if she chooses, but this song just doesn't call for it. I think everyone is going to be pleasantly surprised to hear her range.

As for Trent's involvement/non involvement: good music is good music. Period.

I wouldn't say that the reason the singing didn't sound right is because she didn't belt it out, but because they didn't convey much emotion at all. for example (and yes it'll be nin only because...well...I don't listen to too much else with depressing lyrics) on "the great below" before it got to the screamy part, trent's voice was soft, but the inflections showed a lot of emotion. Quiet is good for a song like this, but flat isn't. It should have emotions to make me cry. It didn't in "A Drowning".

I am really curious though..does it really sound a lot richer in the downloaded track on headphones? If it does, I'll seriously buy it and try that out. Pllleeeaaaassse someone give me good reason to like this song because I so desperately want to!

Crap, I didn't read far down enough before I posted. ^^This is what I was trying to say.

Agree with all of this. I love the music even though it sounds like a left over Fragile song, but the singing...a synthesized voice or a robot could have delivered the same performance. I hope the other songs will prove me wrong.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 05/09/2010 11:19AM by simsim_hb.

 

05/09/10 2:26 PM

I did really like the song when I first heard it, but after listening to it again, I do understand others' criticisms about her voice and all that. I hate to admit it, but it's a perfectly average song and that's about it. That being said, I'm looking forward to hearing the rest of the EP.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/09/2010 01:27PM by spicycatburgers.

 

05/09/10 1:39 PM

Ah...okay. Her voice doesn't suck. Still, leaves me wanting. Some fucktard mentions it's like Sneaker Pimps. What a dipshit. Kinda sounds like a castrated NIN sound. Another band that's become a shell of its former self.

 

05/09/10 1:51 PM

inesperfectdrug posted:
Moral posted:
because howtodestroyangels.com doesn't have a discussion forum yet, and nin discussion might as well be "trent" discussion... as that is how its been treated for years.

jayetheartist posted:
If it needs to be moved, the mods will move it. Let them worry about it.

I don't really agree with either of you, but ok. I understand there are mods that take care of matters like this, but still... I hear a bunch of fans telling everyone not to look at htda as we looked at nin, and yet here it is in the same section. If it is a different matter I do think it shouldn't be in here.
But sure, do what ever you want. I just really think that's kinda contradicting yourselves.


Now on topic, I hear a lot of people saying that we should "detach" the music from the artist, and I'd like to say that to some degree, I understand why, and agree, but I don't think that in this case it will be an easy thing to do. And I'm saying this because we are dealing with a bunch of NIN fans, that have followed Trent for years and want the best for him, and now there's a lady in the picture - and I do believe this relationship is the most "public" one -, and people get intrigued. I think it is obvious that people start digging into her live and start to relate the person to the music. At least that happened to me to some degree. I gave up on doing so because I saw how it affected how I "looked" at the music, and also because it was kinda stalk-ish of me.
SO, my point is, to be detached, we probably would have to never look up Mariqueens life, and I believe that I wasn't the only one making that mistake in the past, and now we can't really "unsee" or "unlearn" what we did about her. So yes, detaching is near impossible, though I understand it's importance.
I think you are just obsessively over-thinking things, as it seems you do it often.
Does A Perfect Circle or Puscifer come up in a discussion about Tool? Im sure. I do follow some of the things Trent does outside of the music. I am rather interested in his marketing, his charity, ect... but I can give a fuck about what color underwear he wears to bed, you need to know when to draw that line. It is really really creepy how some of you feel the need to pry into such personal things. How would you like to be under a giant microscope?

 

05/09/10 1:58 PM

Moral posted:
But sure, do what ever you want. I just really think that's kinda contradicting yourselves.

It's not up to us. That's why I suggested leaving it to the mods. It's not that big of a deal, really.

 

05/09/10 2:03 PM

jayetheartist posted:
Moral posted:
But sure, do what ever you want. I just really think that's kinda contradicting yourselves.

It's not up to us. That's why I suggested leaving it to the mods. It's not that big of a deal, really.
when did I say that.... and in what context?

edit: you meant...

inesperfectdrug posted:
But sure, do what ever you want. I just really think that's kinda contradicting yourselves.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/09/2010 02:05PM by Moral.

 

05/09/10 2:21 PM

^^Sorry. I wasn't careful when I edited down the quotes.

 

05/09/10 3:22 PM

Moral posted:
but I can give a fuck about what color underwear he wears to bed

Last night it was blue.

 

05/09/10 2:49 PM

inesperfectdrug posted:

Now on topic, I hear a lot of people saying that we should "detach" the music from the artist, and I'd like to say that to some degree, I understand why, and agree, but I don't think that in this case it will be an easy thing to do.

I just feel that music is an emotional art, and involves empathic intelligence and skills to appreciate it fully, and I don't really get these people who like to look at music in a more abstract and detached way. smiling smiley

 

05/09/10 2:53 PM

da905 posted:
Yes, many of Trent's fans are obsessed. In fact that's what drives the whole NIN movement, our presence here, heck, the music industry in general. And there are hundreds of examples of this right across the musical (and sporting) spectrum which are just as uncanny. But music is not created in a black box, it is emotive and ilicits an emotional response, so I see nothing wrong with these kinds of reactions (whatever they say about the protagonist). Yet I'm sure no-one means any harm by them, in fact ironically, they are symptomatic of our affection for Trent and our deep affection for his music.
Though the fact is our impression of Trent also comes from never having met him, yet we have built up a profile of him remotely - through interviews, pictures, what we share with each other, etc. This is an important and legitimate part of becoming (somebody's) fan. Who doesn't know where Trent was born, how old he is, and who his idols are?

So apologies for getting off topic. but while this behaviour may not seem entirely rational to some, it's unavoidable in most cases i fear. Fact is, there is no right or wrong... just forum rules to house what we think and control what we express. smiling smiley

I think this was very well written and thoughtful, is basically what I have been trying to say, also.

 

05/09/10 3:18 PM

da905 posted:
Yes, many of Trent's fans are obsessed. In fact that's what drives the whole NIN movement, our presence here, heck, the music industry in general. And there are hundreds of examples of this right across the musical (and sporting) spectrum which are just as uncanny. But music is not created in a black box, it is emotive and ilicits an emotional response, so I see nothing wrong with these kinds of reactions (whatever they say about the protagonist). Yet I'm sure no-one means any harm by them, in fact ironically, they are symptomatic of our affection for Trent and our deep affection for his music.
Though the fact is our impression of Trent also comes from never having met him, yet we have built up a profile of him remotely - through interviews, pictures, what we share with each other, etc. This is an important and legitimate part of becoming (somebody's) fan. Who doesn't know where Trent was born, how old he is, and who his idols are?

So apologies for getting off topic. but while this behaviour may not seem entirely rational to some, it's unavoidable in most cases i fear. Fact is, there is no right or wrong... just forum rules to house what we think and control what we express.

I think this was very well written and thoughtful, is basically what I have been trying to say, also.

...Here, here !

Lovely little essay and comment on the essential walter mitty'ness of being a fansmiling smiley

 

05/09/10 3:20 PM

Apologies to the previous posters. I didn't know how to patch the white quote boxes in, no offence.

 

05/09/10 5:48 PM

lucreziag posted:
I just feel that music is an emotional art, and involves empathic intelligence and skills to appreciate it fully, and I don't really get these people who like to look at music in a more abstract and detached way. smiling smiley

There's a difference between detaching music from whatever biases you have towards or against the person creating it and detaching yourself from the emotional content of the music. Nobody is suggesting the latter.

 

05/09/10 6:20 PM

I love how threads can get so off topic and people can talk/argue about things that have nothing to do with the thread. I guess this page has MOSTLY on-topic comments, but seriously I have learned nothing more about HTDA from page 50 of this thread than I was hoping for. XD

 

05/09/10 6:22 PM

jasphiel posted:
I am so tired of this ....:points to above threads and beyond:.

It's really getting old guys.

jasphiel understands. winking smiley lol

 

05/09/10 8:52 PM

I LOVE this song! I've replayed it over and over since I downloaded it yesterday. i think it's FAR above average. It's very haunting, very beautiful. I love Mariqueen's voice. I think it kicks ass!!!!

 
nin forums : How To Destroy Angels_ Discussion : How To Destroy Angels
Page: <  First... 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55...Last >
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.
 
terms of use | privacy policy