Why is music so unoriginal these days?
 
Page: <  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11...Last >

04/23/09 8:55 PM

I posted this in the what are you thinking thread. It's just an observation...

I think rock N roll is dying...I was looking at the Rolling Stone this morning (latest issue with The Killers) and there's a certain point where it looks like rock just stopped. Music has gone into this weird direction...all Britany, teeny bop pop, pseudo hip hop and rehash....members of Cheap Trick and Smashing Pumpkins have joined forces to start a band and they're all gray haired. The Dead are holding a reunion concert or two...most of the concert tours this summer are older bands out on tour...but EVERYONE in the latest issue are above a certain age. They even had a spread on Dylan's latest album....But it's like something is dying and running it's course. And I don't think anyone's coming along to replace them. It makes me sad.

 

04/24/09 8:21 AM

rock isn't dying, media coverage & public support en masse of rock is dying. there are thousands of kickass rock bands out there, but most people disregard them as lame myspace bands etc, rather than making friends with the artists, and discovering some amazing sounds.


sure there are a million shitty bands online, but there are also many, many hard working artists out there who are totally ignored in favour of artists the media, including rolling stone, are telling them are awesome. rollingstone is redundant, and obviously on the payola bandwagon, as all their reviews could be better written by a 13 year old high school student.

they claim every new artist to hit the pop mainstream is the second coming of christ, at the same time claiming some of the best artists of the last 50 years of music are old, irrelevent, and not even worthy of mention most of the time. trent only gets coverage because he's pushing digital mediums and staying ahead of the curve. if he were just recording albums, he'd be getting lost in the sea of bullshit like 90% of real rock arists these days.

unless you're a corporate band, ie: manufactured by a label, or a pop/hip hop artist using songs & music vids as advertising vehicles, then you're considered dead, no matter how relevant, creative, unique or groundbreaking your latest songs are.

the bands are out there, but you've gotta search for them.

 

04/24/09 6:40 PM

^Pask is completely right.

 

04/25/09 4:13 AM

echoplex89 posted:
I was reading/watching several interviews with an artist I like, Tricky. A reoccurring theme that came up in these interviews was his feeling that new music is becoming very unoriginal.

He feels that now there are many new artists who just want to become popular by creating a hit single that gets a lot of hits on youtube while the rest of the album quality isn't good.

I think he's right. Over the past 3 years I cant say there has been a standout album I would say has been epic or changed the way I feel about music. I enjoyed the last NIN albums, but I always love Trent's work. But what about future artists?

Even Trent has expressed some distaste for a lot of the new music coming out these days with bands trying to recycle music that has already been done before.

Why is this happening to music? Has the I-Pod culture ruined music where we only care about singles instead a full album? Is music suffering because of this.

Tricky Interview
[www.thewire.co.uk]
[www.youtube.com]

Alan Wilder on the Sound Qualityof Today's Music
[www.side-line.com]

Funny that Tricky is criticizing music, because his crap music is the most unoriginal shit ever. Tricky is one overrated "musician". His shit is noise.

 

04/25/09 9:36 PM

I'm sure there are several things contributing here, but I wouldn't be surprised if it's just a way to cut corners and save money. Unoriginal music is the cheapest stuff to produce and churn out as fast as possible, and it's easier to find an attractive person with minimal talent and market their image than it is to find someone with actual musical abilities.

 

04/26/09 12:42 AM

A really great Youtube clip that sort of answers this question.

Why Radio & Music Industry Sucks Nowadays

 

04/26/09 1:28 AM

I'm not convinced that music these days is any less original than it ever was. I think we just tend to forget about the more lackluster music of past eras once we're past them. The passing of time erases a lot of details from our memories.

But if you want to get right down to it, the reason unoriginal and lackluster music gets to be popular is because humans are wired to like things that are familiar. You can blame the music industry all you want for pushing crappy music, but if the general public weren't eager to buy more and more of the same old thing, the labels wouldn't be continuing to put those artists out in the market. Basically, popular music is unoriginal because most people react critically to anything that's extremely different from what they're used to. Think about it -- there's a contingent on this site that simply doesn't like the last few NIN albums just because they aren't enough like PHM or TDS or The Fragile. Change isn't often rewarded.

Combine that with the fact that a lot of people use their taste in music as a way to identify themselves with a group and define their identity, and it's no wonder so few people are eager to embrace something new. "New" won't be popular until there's a big cultural shift to support it.

So yeah, if you want to find original music you're not likely to find it on the radio or whatever. It's out there, but you can't wait for the radio or MTV or music publications to bring it to you, because the bulk of the music industry is too hard up for profits to gamble on acts that don't have a guaranteed audience.

I do think, though, that we're overdue for one of those cultural shifts that makes way for a new definition of what's popular. And then a few years after that happens, we'll be back to bitching that music is stale and unoriginal again, because all the new acts will just be ripoffs of whatever that "new" thing was.

 

04/26/09 6:51 AM

maybe you are looking for new music on wrong places.

music evolves, like everything else living,
and i am glad to say that it will never stop evolving.
this is a new era in music,
where technology is available for everyone
(both musicians and consumers)
and "the genius" is not so hard to find as it was before.

don't expect the "good old bands" to make new revolutions,
there is an ocean of new bands,
extremely talented young people playing music that was never played before,
often not interested in fame and financial success.
open your ears for all that's out there, just a click or two away.

 

04/26/09 10:44 PM

jayetheartist posted:
But if you want to get right down to it, the reason unoriginal and lackluster music gets to be popular is because humans are wired to like things that are familiar. You can blame the music industry all you want for pushing crappy music, but if the general public weren't eager to buy more and more of the same old thing, the labels wouldn't be continuing to put those artists out in the market.

I do think, though, that we're overdue for one of those cultural shifts that makes way for a new definition of what's popular. And then a few years after that happens, we'll be back to bitching that music is stale and unoriginal again, because all the new acts will just be ripoffs of whatever that "new" thing was.

correct on both counts! it's the labels that create this world of shit music, it's the media who promote the fuck out of it so it eclipses non-corporate artists, and it's three quarters of the planet filled with idiots who continue to let the media brainwash them into thinking it's only cool if it's safe and familiar.

it's all propaganda, instead of the faux news war on terror propaganda, it's a global machine made to sell a product, rather than celebrate great music, and the stupid people of the world keep buying into it, keeping the same old shit alive year after year.

there's a particular sound that emerges out of the mess, which half the market latch onto to make more sales from the kids who buy this shit, while the rest of the market just keep rehashing the sounds of the last 15-20 years for the other half who like nothing more than buying the latest band who sounds exactly like the other 9,000 albums on their shelf or in their computer.

i personally think this scene shit has long run its course, emo died in half the time, so why is this shit still everywhere? if real music is still gonna be a scavenget hunt, we need something new to hate while we search already! smiling smiley

 

04/27/09 12:01 AM

Because it sells

 
nin forums : General Discussion : Why is music so unoriginal...
Page: <  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11...Last >
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum. Please log in at the top of the page.
 
terms of use | privacy policy