64 yrs after Hiroshima and Nagasaki
 
Page: <  1 2 3 4

08/17/09 8:12 AM

deconstructer posted:
Honestly I'm fed up with the "discussion" like this. I'm not going to waste any more time on this endless "discussion". I seem to have made a huge mistake in posting on this thread.

I don't understand why you keep doing that. "Discussion"? Yes, this is a discussion. We all have differing opinions, and we have the right to voice them. It's not like any of this happened during peacetime. This was war, and war is a morally gray area, so there are going to be a lot of different arguments. A lot of very difficult decisions have to be made. If you had to make a choice between sacrificing the lives of your own people or sacrificing someone else's, most leaders would take priority in protecting their own men's lives. I don't like it, but I do think in wartime the idea of it being us or them cannot be avoided.

deconstructer posted:
The "Remember Pearl Harbour" mantra will never die, though.

Who had to pay for the Pearl Harbour attack and numerous war crimes the Japanese Imperial Army committed? Ordinary civilians in Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and many other cities? No, they were not responsible.

If you read any of my previous posts, I don't think Pearl Harbor is the reason we attacked Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and I agree with you completely, anyone who thinks Pearl Harbor alone gave us just cause to kill 200,000 civilians is out of their mind. But there were a lot more factors going on than just the attack on Pearl Harbor. Like I said, this was war.

 

08/17/09 9:26 AM

kittenpoker posted:
And there are still people who defend the bombings, calling them necessary...makes me sick.
i actually don't find that "sickening", i personally do not support it but i understand the perspective of those who support it.

 

08/17/09 10:22 AM

Well, if a late comer should remain silent on this board, my bad, I should have remained silent. Sorry about that. Let me make this clear: I'm not blaming Americans when I'm talking about WW II. I think the Japanese Imperial Army and Navy were really stupid and hopelessly wrong. I've been saying this for twenty years (since I was a student).

@Imaginary_Kevin:
I don't think I _keep_ doing anything. I only posted once, and replied once after my post was mysteriously quoted. I should have made it much more clear-cut that my "Remember Pearl Harbour" quote was in response to an early post, found page one (or two) - not to your posts. (I clearly stated at the beginning of my post that "I wasn't aware of this thread until now" meaning I was posting something general.)

Please be aware of this: my point is, even if it was a war, targeting a city is morally and legally wrong. (I know there's a long debate on the "legal" point, but my view is that it's legally wrong.) But in a war, something morally and legally wrong will take place. (That's why war must be abolished in the long run.) I have no objection to Imaginary_Kevin in that point and I don't think and didn't write Imaginary_Kevin or anybody else is mistaken.

The fact is, Japanese did a lot of things that were morally and legally wrong. Americans did things that were morally and legally wrong on Japanese cities, such as Hiroshima. So did British on Dresden. (This list could go on and on.) It was a war.

Then, everytime I mention Hiroshima and/or Nagasaki, American people say "but the Japanese military attack on Pearl Harbour provoked everything," "but there was no other way to stop them from destroying the world" or something like that. Believe it or not, I've experienced this, even if it's outside NINternet, for twenty years. Even when I ask if targeting a city is acceptable or not (this is a very serious question), I've got emotional reactions like "but the Japanese first strike Pearl Harbour!" ("Pearl Harbour" here is just an example in a catalogue of wrong deeds by the Japanese military.) This is as if when you are a Japanese, you can't really talk about war, with "Pearl Harbour" (or Unit 731 or Nanjing massacre) mantra uttered everytime, regardless of the context. I know that's the norm. I have no higher expectations usually.

But I expected something more on a NIN board (a fan forum of a band who released Year Zero etc). So I browsed this thread, and voila! The same old "discussion." AFAIK Kenji is the only Japanese in here, so I thought I might make one post to give another point of view (thus, General LeMay), and then, ... well, you know. I think I've got some other thing to spend time on. Just like some political and academic figures in Europe are Holocaust deniers, some in Japan are Nanjing Massacre deniers. They've got their revisionism, and I must do my share to stop them. I reckon this is something more important.

PS:
I'm not blaming anyone on this board. Please just know that it's not "Hiroshima VS Pearl Harbour." With powerful bombs like Little Boy, it's about targeting a city as a whole.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/17/2009 10:26AM by deconstructer.

 

08/17/09 11:43 AM

Some discussions can become dead ends because people will dig in their heels to make a point no matter which side of the discussion they are on. Sometimes it leads to the thought process of, "I need to make my point known regardless of who's feelings I may step on." I see this thread now doing the same, but I'd like to add something to it that hasn't really been directly addressed.

What happened 64 years ago was horrible, (no matter which side of the debate) but what was also a big part of why things happened the way they did, was because of the mindset that people had at the time. Society was very different than it is now. People did not have access to the info or current events the way they do today. That also included access to history that was documented from a different viewpoint, or even a different country. Look at the way you access info now. You go online & google it to get thousands of pages worth.

There is also TV, radio, newspapers, magazines, text books, & more. Most have covered historical events, but they either didn't exist 64 years ago, or were not accessible to the average person. True, not all the websites or info can be trustworthy, but it's there to read, see, & interpret for yourself. The media that existed back then was fed info by a select few, & whatever it was fed, was closely controlled a lot more than it can be now. Releasing of documents years later usually proves that what happened was never exactly the same as what people were told during that time.

My parents were born during WWII & were teenagers in the 50's. I was born just before Vietnam exploded, & a teen in the 70's. There was a huge difference in what they believed to be a fact compared to what I believed to be fact, simply based on actions by the government & how we were told about it. They saw carefully scripted news reels about what was going on, I saw protests, Vietnam on TV, watched a president get caught lying & resign, & wondered how the hell things changed so much from the time they were kids until the time I was old enough to see it. It was perhaps the tail end of believing everything the government did was the 100% truth.

You can easily take your access to info for granted, I know I have. My parents still believe in certain things based on how they grew up. I suppose it's difficult to change the way you are, or accept that everything you were told or taught, was "a little different" than it really was at the time it happened. They do have that mindset that the US government will always do things for the best interest of it's people. I believe it to be true a certain extent, but I believe it to be more about profits & self serving interests of a select few first.

The many different things I was taught, heard, saw, or believed as a kid or a teen, sometimes changed as I got older. Things we learned in school, saw on TV, maybe even read in books, or even saw in a movie. The way people accepted things as fact, or what was considered to be acceptable, isn't that way anymore. Native Americans were savages that would scalp innocent people for almost no reason. The Soviet Union was waiting off shore with submarines ready to nuke us at any moment. I don't even want to go into what kind of racist crap was rampant & never even questioned. Even though my parents have an older mindset, they did teach me to question authority, so at least they weren't too pig-headed & stubborn.

I'm not interested in changing anyone's mind on what they believe, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I'll have my own opinion on an issue, but not until I've gathered facts from a trustworthy source & weigh in both sides of a discussion evenly & fairly. I'll listen to the other side if it can present it's ideas civilized & remain open minded to my views. While seemingly well constructed & thought out, some of the comments are written by people with no info in their profile, so I have no idea if they're high school students forming an opinion on something they've just read about, or if they've been around long enough to have lived through major events.

I believe that by having not been born yet for parts of history, that you lose an important piece of it. I've read & learned about different topics, but you can easily overlook the magnatude of an event by only reading about it. Emotions can also be a factor in learning. My Grandmother once told me about how she remembered putting my Father into the crib when she heard the news on the radio about the bombings at Pearl Harbor. My Grandfather was in the Navy at the time, so you can only imagine what she was actually thinking about.

No matter how much history you research, or how many statistics you tally on how many people died, & unless you were around to understand what was going on around you, you will never fully understand what happened, or capture the mindset of the way people felt during that time.

 

08/17/09 10:47 AM

Thing is, Hiroshima was home to one of their main military supply depots. So in a way, it was a military target. [www.hiroshima-spirit.jp] The Factories that were originally used to produce peace time goods, were commendeered to create war time weapons, uniforms, and other stuff.

[www.infoplease.com] Kokura arsenal was in Nagasaki. Both were strategic targets for the military. Maybe the Japanese military thought the Americans too soft hearted to bomb civilian areas, hence why they stockpiled their supplies in two main cities, who knows.

So yes, in the eyes of the military, two major enemy supply depots were located in those cities. Take those supplies out, criple the enemy. They also had two new toys to play with, and wanted to test them out. THAT was the sick part.

I see WHY they picked em. I also see the reasons for using the Bomb. It got their point across. Emperor Showa got shaken enough to be a true leader to his people for once instead of allowing blood thristy (and I really think Tojo was a bit touched upstairs if you know what I mean) ministers to make decisions, which what led his country to be in that mess in the first place.

I also think that they didn't fully know the full impact of the devastation Nuclear warfare would bring. Like children playing with matches. Now we know.

 

08/17/09 2:51 PM

deconstructer posted:
Well, if a late comer should remain silent on this board, my bad, I should have remained silent. Sorry about that. Let me make this clear: I'm not blaming Americans when I'm talking about WW II. I think the Japanese Imperial Army and Navy were really stupid and hopelessly wrong. I've been saying this for twenty years (since I was a student).

@Imaginary_Kevin:
I don't think I _keep_ doing anything. I only posted once, and replied once after my post was mysteriously quoted. I should have made it much more clear-cut that my "Remember Pearl Harbour" quote was in response to an early post, found page one (or two) - not to your posts. (I clearly stated at the beginning of my post that "I wasn't aware of this thread until now" meaning I was posting something general.)

Nah, man, you have every right to voice your opinions even if you were here late. In fact, I think you and Kenji have more of a right than anyone here. It happened to your country, and I think it's important we hear your perspective.

Thanks for your post, and explaining what your views are. I understand where you're coming from now. Just as a general statement, I don't know if, in war, it is ever acceptable to attack a city with civilians. Like I said, it is a really morally gray area for me, and I don't think with any subject of questionable morality you can make an absolute statement like "It is never acceptable to attack a city". When a government enters a war, like it or nor, even the people who aren't fighting get dragged into it. As much as it sucks, that's just how war is, especially World War II. When I entered this thread, people were calling the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki war crimes. I think the bombings were terrible tragedies, and it is very unfortunate it happened, but I don't think it was a war crime. That's all I'm saying.

 

08/17/09 4:34 PM

Imaginary_Kevin posted:
Funny. Actually, I apologize for replying to you with an attitude. I shouldn't have done that. But I really don't think, when you consider how many other events have caused even more innocents to suffer, that the bombings themselves were the worst thing humanity has ever done. One of the worst, I'm sure. But not the worst. Now, if you're referring more to the development of nuclear arms rather than just the attack itself, I might agree with you there.
No, I was talking about dropping nuclear weapons on two cities. Just my opinion. Apology accepted and returned.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/17/2009 04:36PM by jabuddha.

 

08/18/09 8:57 AM

pandora114 posted:
One pretty big atrocity to prevent the possible anhiliation of mankind through an uncontrolable biological weapon (Bombs full of plague ridden fleas...can't control where the fleas spread after that, and fleas are VERY VERY hardy creatures...I should know I took their lifecycle in my Animal Care Aide course)

To me you seem to overrate biological weapons which Japan developed. I've read pretty many books on WWII and came to know about unit 731 etc., but I've never heard of possibility of world-wide peril. Japan was so bombed and burnt that there was no way they were able to spread the disease throughout the world. Instead of virus, what they were able to do was just hopeless kamikaze-attack that wasted young souls in vain. Remember anthrax? Some people died or suffered, but looking back it was so hyped. Maybe Bush administration intentionally hyped the fear of anthrax to justify their war on terrorism. Anyway, biochemical weapons is not as effectively devastating as you wrote.

Imaginary_Kevin posted:
I know it's tough to be objective, because you're talking about your own country, but the bomb probably minimized civilian casualties. But either way, I think it was a very difficult decision.

If I regarded number of human lives just as statistics , the answer would be quite apparent - two atrocities, but in total lesser victims. But I'm unsure whether being objective means treating my fellow country people's lives just as numbers. Should we be so objective to our own history that we are expected to accept the aforementioned answer? Honestly I'm a bit confused right now.
Need some time to check my head.

 

08/18/09 7:22 PM

pandora114 posted:
Thing is, Hiroshima was home to one of their main military supply depots. So in a way, it was a military target...

i don't like responding to such stuff 'cause i feel im being patronized,
but that "military target" happened to be a rather densely populated place

posted:
"The Nuremberg Tribunal Charter defined crimes against humanity as ‘murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population before or during the war..."

educate yourself
[www.answers.com]



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 08/18/2009 07:23PM by gaaira.

 

08/18/09 7:44 PM

gaaira posted:
pandora114 posted:
Thing is, Hiroshima was home to one of their main military supply depots. So in a way, it was a military target...

i don't like responding to such stuff 'cause i feel im being patronized,
but that "military target" happened to be a rather densely populated place

posted:
"The Nuremberg Tribunal Charter defined crimes against humanity as ‘murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population before or during the war..."

educate yourself
[www.answers.com]

Than blame the Japanese Military at the time for stockpling weapons in a highly populated area.

 
nin forums : General Discussion : 64 yrs after Hiroshima and ...
Page: <  1 2 3 4
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum. Please log in at the top of the page.
 
terms of use | privacy policy