seasonsinthesky
member
deluxe audio nerd
Joined: 11/27/07
Location: the wide open killingfiel
Posts: 778
|
some food for thought to add to OnslaughtSix's jolly interpretation:
1) names.
- "Mr. Self Destruct," "Piggy," "Ruiner," "Big Man With a Gun," "Eraser," "Reptile" - they're all kinds of names or titles not just for the songs but for characters or phases of characters. possible links: "Mr. Self Destruct" as one name for the two-sided narrator; "Ruiner" and "Big Man With a Gun" as names/phases of the "bad side" that harms people; "Eraser" as the post-"BMWAG" phase of the narrator seeking punishment for the pain he's caused and to erase that history and/or the Ruiner side; "Reptile" as another name for "Piggy," or for whoever the narrator screws in "Closer," or for a(nother) female the narrator encounters.
2) "Mr. Self Destruct."
- could be the narrator or the Ruiner, sure, but there's one line that throws me on this interpretation: "I speak religion's message clear (and I control you)" - if you interpret "Heresy" as the Ruiner convincing the narrator not to believe in god or religion, how could either side of the narrator "speak religion's message clear?" i guess it could be ironic (i.e. the "clear message" is that any religion isn't worth believing), but if it isn't, there's another option: "Mr. Self Destruct" as a name for society, which links to its rejection in "March of the Pigs" and possibly to the character introduced in "Piggy" (see next point).
3) "Piggy." also, homosexuality.
- clearly and obviously supposed to be the reference name for someone that leaves the narrator. but consider the titular connection to "MOTP" - we are introduced to Piggy, who left the narrator and thus stopped limiting him/the Ruiner ["nothing can stop me now"], then religion is tossed out, then society is a bunch of "marching pigs" that need to be disregarded as well. the evolution of the use of "pig" in the lyrics and song titles suggests that Piggy, upon leaving, has joined the empty mass of society the narrator then rejects - society are called pigs because Piggy left the narrator to join the anonymous rest of the world (and since the "disease" in "Heresy" obviously isn't killing the "swine" fast enough, why not help it out?).
- i'm not buying the homosexual "overtones" - you don't have to love a friend as more than a friend just to mourn their leaving or loss. if the lyrics' original intent was in response to Richard Patrick leaving (like the title suggests, if his nickname actually was Piggy - you never know if RP's PR guys invented stuff!), it's actually more of an insult to call him "[Trent's] little piggy," not a homosexually-charged statement.
4) "Heresy." also, perspective.
- is the first verse about a priest/minister, or about the human side of the narrator? i.e. is it from the perspective of the narrator, or the Ruiner?
5) "March of the Pigs." also, phallic imagery.
- most of the language used in the lyrics of "MOTP" strike me as phallic, and i don't just mean "take the skin and peel it back" - i mean "I want a little bit (etc.)," "don't like the look/taste/smell of it," "shove it up inside," and so on. are the pigs "lined up" because society is a bunch of mindless drones suckered in by religion and other shit the narrator grows to hate (i think this is the common interpretation), or are they lined up to suck off/be penetrated by the powerful dicks because it "makes them feel better" to be subservient to "big men with big dicks" (i.e. power and control)? i am leaning toward the latter, because this then sets up "Closer," "I Do Not Want This," and "BMWAG."
6) "Closer." also, honey.
- so, if all the pigs are hungry for dick, and the Ruiner side is influencing the narrator [in "Heresy"], and the Ruiner wants to be powerful and have control ("MSD," other songs later), who says "Closer" is about fucking one person? maybe this is the other side of the situation i'm interpreting from "MOTP" - the pigs love getting dicked by the powerful because it "makes them feel better," and the powerful love dicking the pigs because it "gets them closer to god" (after all, the powerful "flex [their] muscles to keep [their] flock of sheep in line," mixed metaphor or not), so naturally the Ruiner influences the narrator to become one of the controllers in society, hence the first person perspective in the lyrics of "Closer" - "help me become somebody else."
- also, "honey" and the "hive" lyrics link directly to "Reptile;" see the "Reptile" comments below.
7) "Ruiner." also, perspective again.
- considering the majority of the song is from a perspective describing and insulting and questioning the Ruiner, it seems to be an attack from the outside - a step out of the head of the narrator and into one of the pigs (maybe Piggy) watching the narrator's Becoming, asking "how did this happen? this is what you've become - the collector, the infecter." the coda of the song is then the answer, and the step back into the Ruiner/narrator's perspective: "you didn't hurt me. nothing can stop me now."
8) "The Becoming." also, the identity of the machine.
- i find it an endless conundrum that the first lyric in this song is "I beat my machine/it's a part of me/it's inside of me," then the rest of it talks about how the narrator is "now made up of wires" and "all pain disappears" because it's the "nature of his circuitry" - the majority of the lyrics liken the takeover of the Ruiner as the change from flesh to machine, but the very first line says the narrator "beat" the machine, that the narrator won the battle. obviously, he didn't; the Ruiner took over. so, it's either a big slip in phrasing, or the word "beat" means something else. (the return of phallic imagery?)
9) "I Do Not Want This."
- to me, this is the superior example of the struggle between the narrator and the Ruiner [compared to "The Becoming"]. most of the lyrics seem to be from the narrator [the one who "does not want this"], but then the Ruiner interrupts childishly ["don't you tell me how I feel"], and this is all reflected musically by the different instrumentation and the dynamic change. by the end of it, the Ruiner has full control and is ready to break out in total assault mode.
10) "Big Man With a Gun." also, his victim.
- not sure how this can be construed as a homosexual encounter whatsoever. there's absolutely nothing in the lyrics that even says anything about who is on the receiving end of the assault, just the intent of the Ruiner/BMWAG. but if "Closer" is the example of "worldfucking" that i just made it out to be, why would he do it again later in the storyline? i think the answer to that question is rooted in interpreting who is the victim of this attack, and i'm willing to put forward the idea that it's the Ruiner side asserting his dominance over the narrator. with the phallic imagery continued as in "MOTP" and other places earlier, the song is obviously all about asserting the control and power of the Ruiner; and considering he just fought the narrator, won, and took over, it seems likely that the victim is the old self. the battle is over, and the Ruiner is in control, and so he "has fun."
- also, interesting that it shares its tempo with both "Mr. Self Destruct" and "The Downward Spiral."
11) "A Warm Place." also, the source of the epiphany.
- with that consideration, then, "AWP" is now not the epiphany of someone who let his animalistic desires manifest themselves on someone, but rather of someone who realizes the desperation of a person who would be so fractured and bruised and broken that one side could do this to the other. is it the narrator in general, as a whole, having the epiphany? or is it the Ruiner?
12) "Eraser."
- i'm willing to bet it's the Ruiner, because it seems characteristic at this point for his reaction to be intense enough to wish for someone to kill him (and to do drugs in effort to forget, if that's how you interpret the sounds at the start of the song made by the saxophone mouthpiece). he didn't just "see/dream/find/taste/use/scar/fuck/break" other people, he did it to the other half as well. the yearning for death isn't by someone else's hand - it's by the hand of the narrator himself. the Ruiner "now knows the depths he reaches are limitless" and wants the other half to stop it permanently.
13) "Reptile."
- if the object of "Closer" is to fuck as many people as possible ["I want to fuck everyone in the world"], and "Reptile" comes after the culmination of the Ruiner's madness in "BMWAG," maybe "Reptile" is the memory of how things worked during the "Closer" stage of the storyline, with a new perspective on the people being screwed [they're "precious whores" and "liars," "diseases" and "infections," not ways to "get closer to god"]. but if we follow the idea i suggested for "Eraser," it could even be a recounting of the results of the events in "BMWAG."
14) "The Downward Spiral." also, the identity dying.
- it then becomes a totally Fight Clubby scenario in this song, with the narrative not being suicide as such, but the proverbial gunshot-out-the-cheek to kill the other half.
15) "Hurt."
- which would be why it's followed with a song mentioning the needle and heroin (or whatever) use. it's the only way the narrator can deal with offing the Ruiner, following this interpretation [and maybe informed by earlier events if you subscribe to the drug thing in "Eraser"]. perhaps the most unsettling part of this interpretation of "Hurt" is that the final lyrics are stating that the narrator wouldn't change anything even if they could - that somehow, despite all the desperation and pain and horrible shit that happened, some part of him still values it. maybe in a good way (i.e. appreciated because now he's a better person having gotten rid of the Ruiner part) or a bad one (i.e. he liked it all the whole time, and the Ruiner really isn't gone).
edit: fucking smileys!
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/02/2010 06:27PM by seasonsinthesky.
|